<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: thoughts on at&amp;t&#8217;s iphone 3gs upgrade policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindofmatthew.net/2009/06/09/thoughts-on-atts-iphone-3gs-upgrade-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindofmatthew.net/2009/06/09/thoughts-on-atts-iphone-3gs-upgrade-policy/</link>
	<description>everything that matters to matt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 03:17:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://mindofmatthew.net/2009/06/09/thoughts-on-atts-iphone-3gs-upgrade-policy/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindofmatthew.net/?p=100#comment-45</guid>
		<description>At first I was extremely angry. Then after calming down and doing some browsing, it is logical that AT&amp;T would want to recoup its subsidy from existing iPhone 3g users. However, their approach to me it illogical. I have been a long time AT&amp;T customer and generally have no complaints. Customer service was good and I almost always had a signal. I would like to see AT&amp;T off an &quot;extended&quot; contract instead. Meaning extend my contract and additional 2 years so that I can get the new hardware. They would be getting 2 additional years beyond my original contract. Seems fair, especially with Verizon poking its head in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I was extremely angry. Then after calming down and doing some browsing, it is logical that AT&amp;T would want to recoup its subsidy from existing iPhone 3g users. However, their approach to me it illogical. I have been a long time AT&amp;T customer and generally have no complaints. Customer service was good and I almost always had a signal. I would like to see AT&amp;T off an &#8220;extended&#8221; contract instead. Meaning extend my contract and additional 2 years so that I can get the new hardware. They would be getting 2 additional years beyond my original contract. Seems fair, especially with Verizon poking its head in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey</title>
		<link>http://mindofmatthew.net/2009/06/09/thoughts-on-atts-iphone-3gs-upgrade-policy/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindofmatthew.net/?p=100#comment-41</guid>
		<description>This is a great point. 
However, I have learned that with Mac, it is wise to skip a generation that way I dont end up with the high cost of upgrades. I have the 2nd generation iPhone now, yesterday pre-ordered my &#039;s&#039;. 
But I see your frustration and I concur that with this ridiculous use of corporate reaming the Mac community will have the last word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great point.<br />
However, I have learned that with Mac, it is wise to skip a generation that way I dont end up with the high cost of upgrades. I have the 2nd generation iPhone now, yesterday pre-ordered my &#8217;s&#8217;.<br />
But I see your frustration and I concur that with this ridiculous use of corporate reaming the Mac community will have the last word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
